State v. Petro
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
Our question in this appeal is: Does it affirmatively appear from the assigned errors and the record that the defendant was prejudiced or was prevented from having a fair trial? Our question here is not whether there was error at the trial, but whether it affirmatively appears from the record that the defendant was prejudiced by any such error or thereby prevented from having a fair trial.
Section 13449-5, General Code, provides:. “No motion for a new trial shall be granted or verdict set aside, nor shall any judgment of conviction be reversed in any court in case of any inaccuracy or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scott v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Atkins v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. DerighterOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Cooper v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.