Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED COMPLAINT
SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge.
I. BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.
On September 4, 2009, Sacramento Municipal Utility District (“Plaintiff’ or “SMUD”) filed a Complaint (“Compl.”) in the United States Court of Federal Claims, alleging a partial breach of contract and breach of the implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing by the Department of Energy (“DOE”).1 Compl. ¶ 1. The September 4, 2009 Complaint “seeks damages that were incurred beginning January 1, 2004 and continuing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. the United States 09-587c &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013