Legal Opinion

Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 17, 2011No. 09-587CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED COMPLAINT

SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge.

I. BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.

On September 4, 2009, Sacramento Municipal Utility District (“Plaintiff’ or “SMUD”) filed a Complaint (“Compl.”) in the United States Court of Federal Claims, alleging a partial breach of contract and breach of the implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing by the Department of Energy (“DOE”).1 Compl. ¶ 1. The September 4, 2009 Complaint “seeks damages that were incurred beginning January 1, 2004 and continuing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. the United States 09-587c &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API