Legal Opinion
Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 31, 2013No. 09-587CPublished
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 09-587C Filed: January 31, 2013 ************************************* * Collateral Estoppel; * Law of the Case Doctrine; * Mandate Doctrine; SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY * Mitigation Costs; DISTRICT, * Nuclear Waste Policy Act, 42 * U.S.C. §§10101-10270 (2006); Plaintiff, * 10 C.F.R. Part 171 (NRC fees); *
10 C.F.R. § 961.11, Art. VI B; V D v. * (exchange rights); * Fed. R. Evid. 702 (expert opinions); * RCFC 26(a)(1)(A)(iii) (disclosure of THE UNITED STATES, * damages); * RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS Defendant. * (1981); * RESTATEMENT…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Mid-America Tablewares, Inc. v. Mogi Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.