Legal Opinion
Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 31, 2006No. 98-488CPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*334ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT TESTIMONY
BRADEN, Judge.
Consistent with the March 31, 2006 Memorandum Opinion and Order issued, Plaintiff is ordered to submit Supplemental Direct Testimony from Mr. Brian P. Brinig, Brinig & Company, Inc., in the format of five tables and any supporting explanation:
1. Table A—a Summary of Costs by the categories listed in PX 1000 1120,1 for each of the following periods: January 1,1992 through May 14,1997; May 15, 1997 through May 31, 1997; June 1, 1997 through October 31, 1999; and November 1, 1999 through December 31, 2003.
2. Table B—including cost data…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Augustin S. James v. Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army and Philip J. SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.