Legal Opinion

Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 28, 2017No. 15-577CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Damages for Partial Breach of Contract; Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (Experts); Nuclear Waste Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 10101-10270; Waste Classification, 10 C.F.R. 61.66; Licensing Requirements for Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, 10 C.F.R. 72; Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, 10 C.F.R. 961.11.

POST TRIAL MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

BRADEN, Judge

On June 14, 1983, Sacramento Municipal Utility District (“SMUD”) and other nuelear-utility plants entered into a Standard Contract, 10 C.F.R. 961.11 (1983), with the Department of Energy (“DOE”), as required by the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API