Legal Opinion

Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 19, 2005No. 98-488CPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING STANDING AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S JULY 18, 2001 MOTION REGARDING LIABILITY

BRADEN, Judge.

*496FACTUAL BACKGROUND1

A. Statutory And Regulatory Requirements Regarding The Federal Government’s Assumption Of The Legal Duty To Accept, Transport, And Dispose Of Spent Nuclear Fuel And/Or High Level Radioactive Waste From Domestic Utilities.

In 1982, Congress enacted the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq. (“NWPA”), pursuant to which the federal government assumed the legal duty to “provide for the permanent disposal” of spent nuclear fuel2 and/or high-level…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Co. v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API