State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Bolton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record1 sufficient for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition? and (2) Is a ninety-day-suspension with imposition of costs an appropriate disciplinary sanction to be imposed for respondent’s breach of professional discipline? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
The Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] charged Darrell L. Bolton [respondent or Bolton] with four counts2 of professional misconduct. After a hearing, a’PRT panel made *342findings of fact and conclusions…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. WhitebookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.