Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Bolton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1994No. OBAD No. 1127. SCBD No. 3960PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record1 sufficient for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition? and (2) Is a ninety-day-suspension with imposition of costs an appropriate disciplinary sanction to be imposed for respondent’s breach of professional discipline? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

The Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] charged Darrell L. Bolton [respondent or Bolton] with four counts2 of professional misconduct. After a hearing, a’PRT panel made *342findings of fact and conclusions…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. WhitebookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API