United States v. Hebert
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Urging that his plea of guilty to wrongful distribution of marihuana was improvident,1 appellant contends that the stipulation of fact introduced at trial and the extenuation and mitigation testimony of his first sergeant reasonably raised the defense of entrapment. Compare United States v Bueno, 447 F2d 903 (5th Cir. 1971), cert denied, 411 US 949 (1973) with United States v Russell, 411 US 423 (1973), and United States v Garcia, 23 USCMA 403, 50 CMR 285 (1975).2
*500In pertinent part, the stipulation indicated that an informer acting on behalf of Special Agent Rowe approached…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. TimminsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. SuterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. HigginsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. VanzandtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. MoseleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. StewartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.