Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Timmins

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 30, 1972No. 24,805PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Duncan, Judge:

Our review of this case calls for a determination of the providency of a plea of guilty to a specification alleging absence without leave from May 15 to September 9, 1970.

Upon examination by the military judge, prior to the acceptance of the plea, the appellant expressed satisfaction with his counsel, and that his plea was a product of his free will. Timmins also stated:

“MJ: During the time from 15 May 1970, until 9 September 1970, your absence from your unit was without authority from anyone competent to grant you leave or liberty. Is this correct?
“ACC: Yes,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. HintonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. HolderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. VanceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  5. United States v. FarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. JemmingsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. ShackelfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. HebertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. JacksonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API