Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 1, 1989No. Civ. 3-88-215PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANICE M. SYMCHYCH, United States Magistrate.
This matter was before the court on June 14, 1989, for hearing on plaintiffs’ motions to compel discovery from and for sanctions against Pratt & Whitney, Pratt & Whitney’s motion to compel discovery from plaintiffs, and the parties’ joint motion to extend the discovery schedule. Plaintiffs were represented by David Fitzgerald, Esq. Pratt & Whitney was represented by William Flaskamp, Esq. Boeing was represented by Timothy Schupp, Esq.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This action was removed to the United States District Court on April 6,1988, from Hennepin…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Rose v. Batson v. Neal Spelce Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Gestetner Corp. v. Case Equipment Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Rouse v. Farmers State Bank of Jewell, IowaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
- Cohalan v. Genie Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Rolscreen Co. v. Pella Products of St. Louis, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992
- In re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.