In re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, Indiana
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOBRICK, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL.1 This ease arises out of an aircraft crash disaster involving an aircraft known as “ATR-72” which was designed and manufactured in France, and marketed and sold in the United States by defendant, third-party defendant, and counter-claimant Avions de Transport Regional, G.I.E., and defendants Aerospatiale Societe National Industrielle, S.A., (“foreign aircraft defendants”), ATR Support, Inc., ATR Marketing, Inc., and Aerospatiale, Inc., collectively referred to as “aircraft defendants.” The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Howard Jay Josephs v. Harris Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Richard L. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- United Oil Co. v. Parts Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- In re Air Crash at TaipeiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Fudali v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.