Legal Opinion

Oliveri v. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 15, 1986No. Nos. 1147, 1281, Docket Nos. 86-7054, 86-7086PublishedCited by 401 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:

Most lawyers who litigate in our federal courts perform their function at a commendable level of professionalism, advancing claims and defenses with the zeal of a trained advocate, but properly tempering enthusiasm for a client’s cause with careful regard for the obligations of truth, candor, accuracy, and professional judgment that are expected of them as officers of the court. Because, we suppose, in a system as large and diverse as our federal court system, it is inevitable that a few attorneys will occasionally fall short in these professional obligations,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by401 opinions

  1. Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Avirgan v. HullCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

396 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API