Iverson v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
The determinative issue in this workmen’s compensation case is that of causation. The referee, Workmen’s Compensation Board and circuit court each found that claimant had not established by a preponderance of evidence that his debilitating condition— rheumatoid spondylitis — had "arise[n] out of and in the scope of [his] employment,” i.e., that his employment had either caused or aggravated the condition in any material way,1 and accordingly denied his claim for compensation benefits. Claimant appeals, contending that his employment, involving relatively strenuous labor, did in fact aggravate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- O'NEAL v. Sisters of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Volk v. Birdseye DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Geenty v. Hyster, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mueller v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Smith v. CadillacCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978