Legal Opinion

Mueller v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 1978No. A77 04 04756, CA 9133PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This workers’ compensation case presents two issues: (1) whether the claim was timely filed; and (2) whether claimant’s pulmonary emphysema was caused or aggravated by his employment.

Claimant, age 57, worked for employer from 1953 to 1972 as a trailer repairman. This job included welding, painting and repairing bodies of diesel truck trailers. The testimony of claimant and his foreman indicated that working conditions were extremely noxious. The work was done in enclosed areas with no ventilation. Frequently three or four workers would be welding inside a trailer filling it with fumes.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holden v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Volk v. Birdseye DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Iverson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Edge v. Jeld-WenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Compensation of Hatfield v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API