Legal Opinion

Sheban v. A. M. Castle & Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

There were many assignments of error and the case was thoroughly and exhaustively argued, but we shall make such additional statements only as are necessary to present what we consider to be the decisive questions in this case.

The principal contention of the defendant is that, the plaintiff having received compensation under the workmen’s compensation law, the right to recover such compensation being exclusive, he has no other remedy. It appeared without dispute that the Cream City Cartage Company was under the workmen’s compensation law, as was the plaintiff, and that compensation had been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Anderson v. Miller Scrap Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. City of Milwaukee v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Johnson v. Ætna Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Knoll v. ShalerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cermak v. Milwaukee Air Power Pump Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Interstate Power Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Douglas County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Freese v. Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Jones v. Rossbach Coal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API