Cermak v. Milwaukee Air Power Pump Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinions were filed December 7, 1926:
Stevens, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages from a person other than his employer for the same injuries for which compensation had been paid to him by his employer under the workmen’s compensation act.
So far as the workmen’s compensation act determines the procedure by which an employee may recover for injuries sustained in the course of his employment, that act provides the workman’s sole and exclusive remedy. But in all cases that do not come within the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act the injured employee may still resort…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smale v. Wrought Washer Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Hupfer v. National Distilling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Sheban v. A. M. Castle & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Taylor v. Northern Coal & Dock Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by24 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- LePoidevin Ex Rel. Dye v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Terpstra v. Soiltest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Wagner v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Bunner v. PattiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.