Interstate Power Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
It is the contention of the appellant that the contract between Oehler and the Interstate Power Company was governed exclusively by the compensation act of Iowa, where the contract of employment was made. The case presents substantially the converse of the situations heretofore considered in Anderson v. Miller Scrap Iron Co. 169 Wis. 106, 170 N. W. 275, 171 N. W. 935; Zurich G. A. & L. Ins. Co. v. Industrial Comm. 193 Wis. 32, 213 N. W. 630; Wandersee v. Industrial Comm. 198 Wis. 345, 223 N. W. 837; and Val Blatz Brewing Co. v. Industrial Comm. 201 Wis. 474, 230 N. W. 622. In all of these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Anderson v. Miller Scrap Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Pierce v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Val Blatz Brewing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- American Radiator Co. v. RoggeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McKesson-Fuller-Morrisson Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Degray v. Miller Bros. Con. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Buckingham Transp. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.