Legal Opinion

Benn v. UNISYS Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 20, 1997No. CA 96-2642(PJA)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ATTRIDGE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s, Unisys Corporation’s, motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s, Kenwin Benn’s, claims of discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983; Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; and the D.C. Human Rights Act, D.C.Code § 1-2501, et seq. In the joint pretrial statement filed by the parties on September 12, 1997, the plaintiff abandoned his claims pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1866, leaving only Benn’s claims of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rowland v. RileyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. King v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  3. Richardson v. District of Columbia Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Presstek v. CreoDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007
  5. Roe 1 v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API