Legal Opinion
Richardson v. District of Columbia Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 22, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-0458PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Charlotte M. Richardson brings this action against the District of Columbia Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services (“DYRS”) alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2000); age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a); retaliation and hostile work environment in violation of both Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3 (2000), and the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. § 623(d); and violation of the Family…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chambers v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Chambers v. Office of the Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Lexington Insurance Company v. Paddock Swimming Pool CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Stanford v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025