Legal Opinion
Presstek v. Creo
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 30, 2007No. 05-CV-65-PBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Presstek, Inc. v. Case N o . 05-cv-65-PB Opinion N o .
2007 DNH 044
Creo, Inc. and Creo Americas, Inc. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Creo, Inc. and Creo Americas, Inc. (collectively “Creo”) have moved to strike supplemental expert disclosures filed by Presstek, Inc. on the ground that they were filed after the parties’ agreed-upon deadline for expert disclosures. Presstek denies that the disclosures were late and alternatively claims that they should not be stricken because it was justified in making the disclosures when it did, Creo was not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trilogy Communications, Inc. v. Times Fiber Communications, Inc., and Lpl Technologies, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Michael D. Trost v. Trek Bicycle CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Klonoski v. MahlabCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Coles v. PerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Kauch v. Department for Children, Youth & Their FamiliesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- G.K., by their next friend, Katherine Cooper et al. v. Christopher Sununu, Governor of New Hampshire et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024
- G. K. v. Governor, NH, State ofDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024