Legal Opinion

Roe 1 v. United States

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 20, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00270Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANE ROE #1, et al., No. 1:19-cv-00270-DAD-BAM 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PROCEED 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., PSEUDONYMOUSLY 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 16) 16 17 18 INTRODUCTION 19 This matter is before the court on the individual plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to proceed 20 in this action pseudonymously. (Doc. No. 16.) Each of the individual plaintiffs—Jane Roe #1, 21 Jane Roe #2, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, John Doe #5, and John…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API