United States v. Bernardo Saenz
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Bernardo Saenz appeals the district court’s refusal to award him a two-point reduction in his base offense level for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) § 3E1.1. In addition, Saenz contests the district court’s two-level increase in his base offense level for misrepresentations made to the probation offi cer during Saenz’s presentenee interview. We affirm for the following reasons.
I
Bernardo Saenz was charged with distribution of and possession with intent to distribute an aggregate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. HamptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. Anthony Medina (91-1852) Nathaniel Wilson (91-1869) Neville King (91-1891/1892)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Frierson, JeromeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Nicolas Herrera-FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robert Douglas TreadwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.