Legal Opinion

United States v. Bernardo Saenz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1990No. 89-4034PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Bernardo Saenz appeals the district court’s refusal to award him a two-point reduction in his base offense level for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) § 3E1.1. In addition, Saenz contests the district court’s two-level increase in his base offense level for misrepresentations made to the probation offi cer during Saenz’s presentenee interview. We affirm for the following reasons.

I

Bernardo Saenz was charged with distribution of and possession with intent to distribute an aggregate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. HamptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United States v. Anthony Medina (91-1852) Nathaniel Wilson (91-1869) Neville King (91-1891/1892)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Frierson, JeromeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Nicolas Herrera-FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Robert Douglas TreadwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API