Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Medina (91-1852) Nathaniel Wilson (91-1869) Neville King (91-1891/1892)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1993No. 91-1852, 91-1869, 91-1891 and 91-1892PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Defendants,' Anthony Medina, Neville King, and Nathaniel Wilson, appeal their jury convictions and sentences for conspiracy to distribute and distribution of cocaine, unlawful use of a communication facility, and use of a firearm to facilitate drug trafficking.' The defendants assert that their right to a fair trial was denied by decisions of the trial court which resulted in (1) restrictions on access to witnesses as well as restrictions on the cross-examination of witnesses, (2) denial of a continuance, (3) the government’s refusal to turn over Jencks Act…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Robert Dale Murr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. ShareefCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. ElderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Workman v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API