Legal Opinion

United States v. Nicolas Herrera-Figueroa

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1991No. 89-50660PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Nicolas Herrera-Figueroa appeals his sentence, contending that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by refusing to grant him a two-point reduction in the level of his offense for acceptance of responsibility. His appeal raises the question whether a federal probation officer may refuse to honor a defendant’s request that his attorney be present during the presentence interview. Concluding that the exclusion of counsel from presentence interviews serves no rational purpose, we exercise our supervisory power over the orderly administration…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. United States v. Harry Jarmar GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Patrick InnieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Juan Rubio-VillarealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Anthony LapierreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Maxwell Hoffman v. A.J. Arave, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API