Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Squire v. Taft
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 1994No. 94-674PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Per curiam
For the following reasons, we deny relator’s motion for rehearing on the motion to quash, and we deny the writ.
Relator sets forth two propositions of law:
“[1.] Ohio Revised Code Section 3501.05 imposes an affirmative duty upon the Secretary of State to investigate election fraud and report violations of election laws to the attorney general and prosecuting attorney for the county where the fraud occurred or both.”
“[2.] A declaration of candidacy and petition shall be determined invalid and rejected upon a finding by the Secretary of State that a candidate has engaged in fraud as to a material…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Ruehlmann v. LukenOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. White v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Murr v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Beck v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by33 opinions
- State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Choices for South-Western City Schools v. AnthonyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Brown v. Nusbaum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.