Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beck v. Casey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1990No. 90-510PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

We find that the alteration of the date on the February 7 declaration of candidacy was not material and that different dates on declaration of candidacy forms do not destroy the unity of a declaration of candidacy. Accordingly, we overrule respondents’ motion to dismiss and issue a peremptory writ of mandamus in the first instance requiring respondent board to place relator’s name on the May 8, 1990 primary ballot as a candidate for the office of member of the Republican State Central Committee for the Twelfth Congressional District.

Respondents argue that the board’s decision is final in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stern v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State ex rel. Temke v. OutcaltOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Ashbrook v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hinkle v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Citizens for Responsible Taxation v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Squire v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Yiamouyiannis v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API