Legal Opinion
Pease v. Industrial Com'n of Utah
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1984No. 19787PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the Industrial Commission obtained jurisdiction over Ray W. Pease and his wife, Corrine Pease, for the purpose of establishing their personal liability for a workmen’s compensation award.
In March 1983, Luther Sanders was severely injured while working for Norco Drilling Services (Norco), a partnership. He applied for workmen’s compensation, and on May 11 the Industrial Commission mailed a notice of hearing to Ray Pease and Keith Norwood, dba Norwood Drilling Service, at Norco’s business address. The notice informed Norwood and Pease that they…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Worrall v. Ogden City Fire DepartmentUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Woody v. RhodesUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- Glen M. Barney & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Summa Corp. v. Lancer Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
- Sorensen v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brown & Root Industrial Service v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Badger v. Brooklyn Canal CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Nyrehn v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Johnson v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Ashcroft v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.