Legal Opinion

Moss v. Chronicle Publishing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 11314PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This is an action by plaintiff for personal injuries received by him in June, 1922. Said injuries were caused by the act of one Robert Miotti and the question of negligence is not an issue on this appeal. Plaintiff alleged a cause of action against each of the defendants, Charles A. Mowry and The Chronicle Publishing Company, a corporation, under the rule of respondeat superior. The trial developed into a contest between these two defendants as to whose servant Miotti was in the doing of the act out of which plaintiff’s cause of action arose. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Billing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. McNamara v. . LeipzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Pruitt v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Cannon v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Welch v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Nash-Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Halkias v. Wilkoff Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lowell v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Marsh v. Tilley Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Housewright v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API