Legal Opinion
Carrig v. Oakes
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The question here presented arises upon a motion made on behalf of the defendant O’Hern to amend the verdict of the jury in which motion the defendants Oakes joined. The facts pertinent'to the motion are, briefly, as follows.
The action is for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff as a consequence of the negligence of the defendants in respect of the operation of two motor vehicles, she being a passenger in the car owned and operated by O’Hern which came into collision with a car owned by Amor Oakes and operated by Clara Oakes, his wife. The cause having been tried…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Kinsey v. William Spencer & Son Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Kinsey v. William Spencer Son CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Polsey v. Waldorf-Astoria, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Kinsey v. William Spencer & Son Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gleich v. VolpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Leal v. SimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Micaric v. MannNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Liebman v. County of WestchesterNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Carrig v. OakesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.