Legal Opinion

Kinsey v. William Spencer & Son Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. The important question in the case is raised by defendants’ claim that defendant Scotto was the ad hoc employee of a third party. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. There was ample evidence to warrant a finding by the jury that at the time of the accident defendant Scotto was in the corporate defendant’s employ. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Close, J., concurs as to the appellant Scotto, but dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaint as to appellant William Spencer & Son Corporation, with the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wyllie v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Kinsey v. William Spencer & Son Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Muldoon v. City Fireproofing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Estate of Underwood v. National Credit Union AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Weeks v. ChurchillColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Faison v. Nationwide Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Raplee v. City of CorningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  5. Goines v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API