Legal Opinion
Kinsey v. William Spencer & Son Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1937PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKadien, J.
The plaintiff, while working on Pier 33, Brooklyn, N. Y., in the course of his employment with the Huron Stevedoring Corporation, was injured by a loading crane owned by the defendant William Spencer & Son Corporation and operated by the defendant Frank Scotto.
He brought separate actions against each of these defendants to recover damages for his personal injuries. These actions were tried together before a jury and this court. A sealed verdict was ordered upon stipulation of counsel, which provided also that fhe verdict should be opened in the absence of the jury. The verdict of the jury was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gilbert v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Wright v. J. & S. WilcoxNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Phelps v. . WaitNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- City of Birmingham v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Fedden v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Estate of Underwood v. National Credit Union AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Weeks v. ChurchillColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
- Faison v. Nationwide Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Kinsey v. William Spencer & Son Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Raplee v. City of CorningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.