Legal Opinion

Micaric v. Mann

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

The novel legal issue presented on this motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 is whether the court may direct a new trial solely on the issue of punitive damages when the jury declined to award such damages.

FACTS-

Plaintiffs, students in defendant’s acting school, instituted this action to recover damages based on allegations of sexual abuse and harassment.

At trial the moving plaintiffs (all of whom were in their early 20’s at the time of the incidents complained of) testified that defendant (who was then in his mid-60’s) caused them to perform at school various…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Loeb v. TeitelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Rupert v. SellersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. O'Connor v. PapertsianNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Laurie Marie M. v. Jeffrey T. M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Deborah S. v. DiorioCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
  4. Ostano Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API