Legal Opinion
Polsey v. Waldorf-Astoria, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 19, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.
The order now here denied plaintiff’s motion to correct the verdict rendered in this action and granted defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict as improper in form, besides granting a new trial on the whole issue.
The verdict in this action was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $4,500 against the defendant Waldorf-Astoria, Inc., and in the sum of $500 against the defendant Robert H. Parker. The verdict was not then set aside on the ground that it was contrary to law or to the evidence, nor was it revoked on a motion made on the minutes of the trial, nor on any ground under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Beal v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- O'Shea v. KirkerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1859
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Dextone Co. v. Building Trades Council of Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Rivera v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Kinsey v. William Spencer & Son Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Farber v. DeminoNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.