State Ex Rel. Seifert v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Cottonwood County District Court denying relators’ motion for amended findings or for a new trial. It involves the interpretation of a paragraph of the last will of John E. Esser, decedent, which reads as follows:
“Sixth: I direct that my executor and executrix employ Seifert, Johnson & Hand, Fairmont, Minnesota, as attorneys in the probating of this estate.”
The probate court refused to direct the executor and executrix to comply with this provision, and relators brought' certiorari in the district court, claiming that where testator in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- In re Estate of OgierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lawler v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- In Re the Accounting of CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Hayes v. PrattSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Succession of WallaceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- McMullin v. BorgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Guest v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Nordling v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- In Re Estate of BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.