Legal Opinion

Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. Allen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 1930No. 19442PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFER, C.

This action is to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the pollution of a stream running through plaintiff’s farm, by casting therein salt water, crude oil, and base sediment from oil wells, etc.

Plaintiff, among other allegations, stated in her petition that the 160 acres of land involved were purchased and were chiefly valuable for stock breeding and stock raising purposes, and had been used for such purposes since about 1899, and that by reason of the contour, etc., of said land, and the location of tbe stream, etc., together with the timber growing along the hanks…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Hospital v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Comar Oil Co. v. HackneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Bales v. BreedloveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Union Oil & Mining Co. v. BowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Avery v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Company v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Oklahoma City v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Moyer v. CordellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. United States v. FixicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API