Legal Opinion
United States v. Fixico
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1940No. 2038, 2039, 2045, 2046PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
The questions presented in these four cases are (1) whether an action to recover damages for injury by pollution to restricted land in Oklahoma allotted to a member of the Five Civilized Tribes of Indians may be removed from the state court to the United States court under section 3 of the Act of April 12, 1926, 44 Stat. 239, 240, and (2) whether an order of the United States court remanding such a case may be re-examined in this court, either by appeal or mandamus.
Amon Fixico, an enrolled full-blood Creek Indian, instituted No. 2038 in the District Court of Hughes…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- In Re Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Gay v. RuffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Anglin & StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Butler v. DentonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Federal Trade Commission v. MenziesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- Lena Harkins and Adam Harkins, for Themselves and for All Those Members of the Five Civilized Tribes Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.