Legal Opinion

Union Oil & Mining Co. v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1930No. 19475PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

This was an action for damages for polluting a stream of fresh water by the drainage of salt water, oil or base sediment escaping from tanks or reservoirs containing- oil and these other named substances. The plaintiff was the owner of 80 acres of land across which there flowed a creek, a perpetual stream of fresh water fed by numerous springs. Along the banks of the creek it appears there was a considerable growth of trees such as oak, walnut, and other varieties. The defendant owned and operated an oil lease adjacent to plaintiff’s land. On said lease there were a few oil wells…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Idaho Gold Dredging Corp. v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Barci v. Intalco Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. WorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API