Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 15, 1996PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
David and Kimberly McKenzie (McKen-zies) appeal from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County (trial court) that granted a motion in limine and a motion for summary judgment filed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse), the Vanport Township Municipal Authority (Vanport) and the Brighton Township Municipal Authority (Brighton).
On April 20, 1989, Kimberly McKenzie gave birth to a daughter, Sydney. Shortly after her birth, Sydney was diagnosed with a ventricular septal defect. After an unsuccessful surgery that attempted to correct the cardial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Commonwealth v. TopaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. DunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Trach v. FellinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BlasioliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Riccio v. S&T Contractors, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.