Legal Opinion

Riccio v. S&T Contractors

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County

Decided June 22, 2001No. nos. 98-07740, 98-07741, 99-05984, 99-06295 and 99-06359PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAHON, J.,

June 22, 2001 on consideration of the motions in limine of defendants Modem Exterminating and Control Co. Inc. and Norman and Roslyn Stephen seeking preclusion of evidence of a causal link between a deck collapse on July 25, 1997 and plaintiff Carla Ramos’ (now Carla Cruse) fibromyalgia syndrome or its aggravation we enter the following:

*88OPINION

The factual and procedural history of these consolidated matters is described in detail in our prior orders and will not be repeated here. In particular, the parties, their claims, and the manner of consolidation are described in our order of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. BocciaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Grant v. BocciaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. AMCO Insurance v. Emery & Associates, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Johnson v. DuffyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Com. v. Brooks, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API