Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dunkle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1992No. 32 and 33 M.D. 1990PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

We are called upon to decide whether the trial court erred in permitting expert testimony about the behaviors exhibited by children who have been sexually abused was error in a case in which the appellee was charged with sexual abuse of a minor. Additionally, we must decide whether the expert testimony was properly admitted to explain why sexually abused children may not recall certain details of the assault, to explain why they may not give complete *171details, and to explain why they may delay reporting the incident. Finally, we address the issue raised by…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. O'SEAROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. CountermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Hadden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  5. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API