Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Vertlieb

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1943No. Crim. 4463PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Following a trial upon an information charging Jack Vertlieb and Sam Richlin with the crime of bookmaking, as defined in section 337a of the Penal Code, the court found each of them guilty but suspended further proceedings and placed them upon probation. They have appealed from an order denying them a new trial.

The evidence shows that when two officers entered a room on the second floor of an apartment house in Los Angeles they found Richlin seated in a chair near a table where there were two telephones and some blank betting markers. Vertlieb was in a room nearby. In the presence of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. People v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. People v. KabakoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. CarellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. KobeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. People v. ChannellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. People v. RenekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API