Legal Opinion

People v. Renek

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 1951No. Crim. 4603PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, defendant was charged with a violation of subdivision 2, section 337a of the Penal Code in that he did keep and occupy a store at 248 East Fifth Street in the city of Los Angeles, with books, papers, paraphernalia, etc., for the purpose of registering and recording bets on horse races.

Following a plea of not guilty and waiver of trial by jury, defendant was convicted by' the court. His motion for a new trial was denied, proceedings were suspended and he was granted conditional probation. From the order denying his motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. People v. CayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. CarswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hindman v. Texas Lime CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. McCreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. LintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API