Legal Opinion
People v. Hinkle
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1923No. Crim. No. 1017PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
By an information containing three counts defendant was charged, in the first count, with the crime of occupying a room with papers for the purpose of recording bets upon the result of a contest of speed between horses—the offense defined in subdivision 2 of section 337a of the Penal Code. In the second and third counts he was charged, respectively, with the offenses defined in subdivisions 3 and 4 of the section. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on all three of the counts. A new trial was granted as to counts two and three. The appeal is from the judgment of conviction on count one and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- In re the Estate of GorkowWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. WolfleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Estate of SchluttigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. NicklesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. KobeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.