Legal Opinion

People v. Kelley

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1943No. Crim. 4419PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

George Kelley complains that his conviction upon the charge of occupying an apartment for the purpose of bookmaking, contrary to the provisions of section 337a, subdivision 2, of the Penal Code, was obtained by the use of evidence received in violation of section 605 of the Federal Communications Act (Act of June 19, 1934, c. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, 1103, 47 TJ.S.C. 605, 47 U.S.C.A. 605.) Upon appeal, he challenges an order denying him a new trial upon grounds which raise questions concerning constitutional rights and also the scope of the federal statute.

According to the testimony of police…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Rogers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. HaeusslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Courtney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API