Legal Opinion

Cheveldave v. Tri Palms Unified Owners Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 2018No. E066461MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 10/31/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ALEX CHEVELDAVE, Plaintiff and Appellant, E066461 v. (Super.Ct.No. PSC1600368) TRI PALMS UNIFIED OWNERS ORDER MODIFYING OPINION; ASSOCIATION, AND DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING Defendant and Respondent. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] The petition for rehearing filed by respondent on October 18, 2018, is denied. The opinion filed in this matter on October 3, 2018, is modified as follows: On page 17 of the opinion, the paragraph that begins “A mutual easement has the same…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.California Supreme Court · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API