Legal Opinion
Petrolite Corporation v. Baker Hughes Incorporated and Baker Performance Chemicals Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 5, 1996No. 95-1447PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Petrolite Corporation appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, holding on summary judgment that United States Patent No. 4,978,512, is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Petrolite Corp. v. Baker Hughes Inc., Civ. Action No. Civ-94-311 (W.D.Ok. Mar. 20, 1995) (final judgment order). Because we agree with the district court that Petrolite has not raised a genuine issue as to any material fact and that Baker Hughes Inc. and its subsidiary Baker Performance Chemicals Inc. (Baker) are entitled to judgment as a matter of law,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Bose Corporation v. Jbl, Inc. And Infinity Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Vanmoor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In Re John KollarCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- American Seating Co. v. USSC Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.