Legal Opinion
Vanmoor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 10, 2000No. Nos. 99-1190, 99-1256PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
Arthur Vanmoor appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, holding on summary judgment that United States Patent No. 5,582,331 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and that Vanmoor’s trade secrets had not been misappropriated. Vanmoor v. Wal-Mart, Inc., Civ. Action No. 97-CIV-6907 (S.D.Fla. Dec. 15, 1998) (final judgment order).1 Because we agree with the district court that Vanmoor has not raised a genuine issue as to any material fact and that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its co-appellees are entitled to judgment as a matter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Transmatic, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Gulton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Stuart R. Meyers v. Asics Corp., and Asics Tiger Corp., and Hyde Athletics IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Petrolite Corporation v. Baker Hughes Incorporated and Baker Performance Chemicals IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Weatherchem Corporation v. J.L. Clark, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- IMMUNOCEPT, LLC v. Fulbright & Jaworski, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Aquatex Industries, Inc. v. Techniche SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bose Corporation v. Jbl, Inc. And Infinity Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Pioneer Magnetics, Inc. v. Micro Linear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Atlanta Attachment Co. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.