Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1962No. Civ. 25682PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
This action in quo warranto, brought by the People on relation of Pierpont M. Hamilton, seeks to have declared void Ordinance No. 2765 of the City of Santa Barbara which approves annexation of an inhabited strip of land commonly known as the Monteeito strip. Defendant city’s general demurrer was sustained without any mention of leave to amend; this implied ten days leave so to do under rule 202(e) of Judicial Council Rules for the Superior Courts; no amendment having been filed, the court entered judgment for defendant on March 16, 1961, and plaintiff has appealed.
Appellant attacks the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Burlingame v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Page v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Page v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Griffin v. City of RobardsKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Frazier v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- People Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.