Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City of Santa Barbara

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1962No. Civ. 25682Published

1Opinion of the Court

205 Cal.App.2d 501 (1962)

THE PEOPLE ex rel. PIERPONT M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA, Defendant and Respondent.

Civ. No. 25682.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

July 9, 1962.

Schramm, Raddue & Seed and Paul W. Hartloff, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Stanley T. Tomlinson, City Attorney, and Willard W. McEwen, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

ASHBURN, J.

This action in quo warranto, brought by the People on relation of Pierpont M. Hamilton, seeks to have declared void Ordinance No. 2765 of the City of Santa Barbara…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API