First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
In this opinion we consider an issue on remand from the United States Supreme Court. The high court held a landowner is entitled to compensation—not merely injunctive relief—when a court finds there has been an unconstitutional regulatory taking. But the Supreme Court expressly reserved the question whether respondent’s regulatory action in this case amounted to an unconstitutional taking. We decide appellant failed to state a cause of action for two independent and sufficient reasons: (1) The interim ordinance in question substantially advanced the preeminent state interest…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- McDougal v. County of ImperialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Long Beach Equities, Inc. v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Steinbergh v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.